The 'progressive' position on tyranny and oppression

Melanie Phillips:

The news that President Bush has nominated Paul Wolfowitz to run the World Bank has sent the appeasement crowd into a frenzy. Hardly had they got over the shock that John Bolton, the abrasive UN critic, had been appointed ambassador to that nest of vipers than the intellectual architect of the Iraq war himself was now being put up to run international development. The idea that, as a result, the tyrants and dictators who have used the UN to foment global terror might be held to account for the first time, and that international aid might no longer be used to line the pockets of said tyrants and dictators thus financing said global terror, is regarded of course by the appeasement crowd as the end of the world as they know it. Cause for a double dose of garlic to wave in the direction of these iconic princelings of darkness. The Guardian's leader contains a particularly priceless observation about Wolfowitz:

'Some worry that his strong emphasis on human rights may complicate relations with China.'

Thus the 'progressive' position on tyranny and oppression.

...

Melanie thinks Condi may have moved Bolton and Wolfowitz out os position to influence policy. I am not sure. If I were President, I would still give someone as smart as Wolfowitz a call to get his thoughts on issues.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains