Uranium One informant sues to get return of bribe money

Washington Times:
A FBI informant who gave the government information about a Russian bribery plot implicated in the sale of U.S. uranium rights tried unsuccessfully last year to recover upwards of $700,000 in bribes he said he was authorized to pay as part of the FBI investigation.

William D. Campbell has emerged now as the key figure in a congressional probe into Russia’s 2010 purchase of U.S. uranium rights and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s role in approving the deal.

His identity had been shielded for weeks, but court records obtained by The Washington Times, as well as a report by Reuters, identified the man.

Mr. Campbell has not returned calls from The Washington Times seeking comment, but his civil suit, describing his involvement in the FBI investigation, matches details of the criminal case brought against Vadim Mikerin. Mikerin, who was the head of U.S. operations for Tenex, a subsidiary of Russia’s atomic energy giant Rosatom, was convicted of money laundering and other crimes and in 2015 sentenced to four years in prison.

The Senate Judiciary Committee, House Intelligence Committee and House Oversight Committee have all begun to probe the circumstances of Rosatom’s purchase of Canadian mining companyUranium One, which had mining rights in the U.S. Investigators have questioned whether the American agencies that signed off on the sale, including the State Department, were ever made aware of the FBI’s ongoing investigation of Mikerin and Tenex.

Mr. Campbell told Reuters that he was the confidential informant cited in the Mikerin case. And Victoria Toensing, a lawyer for the informant, has previously told Fox News that her client filed a civil lawsuit to get an unspecified amount of money back that he paid out in bribes during the case after the FBI failed to return the money to him. She has not responded to subsequent requests for comment.
...

According to Mr. Campbell’s lawsuit, which was later voluntarily withdrawn, his consulting company Sigma was first hired by Mikerin in 2007 — despite the fact he had no experience with nuclear fuel sales. Mr. Campbell’s lawsuits also states that his company Sigma International first entered into a contract with Mikerin in 2009, and that shortly thereafter Mikerim demanded the first kickbacks. After that, he “voluntarily reported the initial request for a kickback to the FBI.”

“The FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice authorized the Plaintiffs to participate in the kickback and extortion scheme so that they could start documenting Mikerin’s activities in the U.S., as well as others involved in illegal activity,” the lawsuit states. “Thereafter, Campbell served as an informant for the FBI and kept the FBI abreast of the Defendants’ kickback and extortion demands and his interactions with the Defendants.”

According to the complaint he went on to wear a wire to video recorded meetings with the defendants and continued to meet with them at the FBI’s request even after his contract with Tenex had ended.

But Mr. Campbell’s lawsuit states that he suffered business losses as a result of the extortion scheme and after the criminal charges against Mikerin were announced in 2014. He sought punitive damages as a result of the losses and extortion scheme.
...
Why do the Democrats keep claiming that there is nothing to be learned about the Uranium One deal?  As interesting as this story is it raises, even more, questions about his relationship with the FBI and why they allegedly renigged on the deal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains